产业动态
The menace of suspect bowling action
In BCCI's domestic first class matches and the under-19 competitions, the umpires have been empowered to and then bowlers, who TRX Workouts in their opinion, are chucking.
The bowler in question is and warned twice. If he is a third time, he cannot bowl further in the innings. Then, the on-field umpires via the match-referee also send a report accompanied with the video footage from the game to the Board's panel on suspect bowling actions. This eminent committee comprises S. Jayaprakash.
Truth to tell, there has been plenty of delay from the time Samuels' action came under scrutiny he was reported on April 14 and now. From the period in question, has the video footage reached the select panel and have the wise men come to any conclusion. Has any meeting been held at all?
Or will that happen only after the current edition of the IPL is over which would make the entire process farcical in nature? Surely, IPL cannot be seen to be on chucking. And Samuels is already someone who has been in plenty of trouble vis-à-vis his bowling action in the past in international cricket.
Also, a bowler should be stopped from bowling from the first time he is There should not be a second occasion.
Former India paceman Balwinder Singh Sandhu, now a prominent coach, said to The Hindu, is the point in reporting someone if he cannot be in the match. The bowler can get five wickets in the game and the damage is done. In case, he has an illegal action, he should not be allowed to bowl. He has to be stopped from bowling from the first time he is As simple as that. This is not good for the game. It should be made mandatory for all bowlers to bowl in half-sleeve shirt. And I TRX Force Kit think the 15 degree flexion rule gives someone the license to throw. A bowler will never chuck if he is conscious that he is bowling before a bio-mechanic in test conditions. Bowlers tend to throw when they are under pressure from a batsman in the middle. They only report him and the subsequent chain of events could eventually lead the bowler to the clinic of a bio-mechanic down under. There are complaints that the bowlers who have been cleared by the bio-mechanics after taking remedial measures start chucking again in match situations.
The BCCI's policy of giving the power to the umpire to is a better method. Apart from being a more direct way of dealing with a major issue, it can also act as huge deterrent being in a match can be humiliating from a mental perspective to the bowler.
However, the BCCI procedure has its limitations too. For instance, the panel can only give its opinion on the clipping in question and does not look at the entire repertoire of the bowler.
Also, it can only send its recommendations. Then, the respective state associations direct their level-III coaches to correct the erring bowlers earlier the bowlers were sent to the NCA.
The BCCI does not rely much on the 15 degree flexion rule not such a bad thing at all but there are a Cheap TRX Trainer few flaws in its approach. For instance, unless a bowler is a blatant chucker, the umpires have been advised to and not bowlers in the under-16 matches. 相关的主题文章:
http://www.winc-hosting.nl/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?248760.last
http://www.chegechedi.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=439179
编辑：系统管理员
